Global Labor Cost Index 2026: Engineering and Tech Roles Across 12 Markets

TCE index across 12 markets (San Francisco = 100) at senior and mid-level, statutory employer contribution rates by country, 5-year salary appreciation rates by market, and quality-adjusted cost efficiency index.

r
remvix
May 5, 2027

This report presents a comprehensive labor cost index for engineering and tech roles across 12 markets, comparing Total Cost of Employment (TCE) at four seniority levels. Data from Mercer Global Compensation Survey 2025-2026, Aon Hewitt Compensation Benchmark, Radford Global Technology Survey, and Remvix client compensation data.

TCE Index by Market (US San Francisco = 100)

Senior Software Engineer (7–10 YOE), Full-Time Employee, All-In TCE

  • San Francisco, US: Index 100 | Approx. TCE $290,000–$380,000/year
  • New York, US: Index 88 | Approx. TCE $250,000–$335,000/year
  • Austin / Denver, US: Index 72 | Approx. TCE $205,000–$275,000/year
  • London, UK: Index 65 | Approx. TCE $185,000–$250,000/year
  • Berlin, Germany: Index 52 | Approx. TCE $148,000–$200,000/year
  • Warsaw, Poland: Index 28 | Approx. TCE $80,000–$107,000/year
  • Bucharest, Romania: Index 22 | Approx. TCE $62,000–$85,000/year
  • Medellín, Colombia: Index 18 | Approx. TCE $52,000–$70,000/year
  • Mexico City, Mexico: Index 20 | Approx. TCE $58,000–$78,000/year
  • Manila, Philippines: Index 13 | Approx. TCE $38,000–$52,000/year
  • Bengaluru, India: Index 17 | Approx. TCE $50,000–$68,000/year
  • Hyderabad, India: Index 15 | Approx. TCE $43,000–$60,000/year

Mid-level Software Engineer (3–7 YOE)

  • San Francisco: Index 100 | TCE $195,000–$260,000
  • New York: Index 86 | TCE $168,000–$225,000
  • Austin: Index 69 | TCE $135,000–$180,000
  • London: Index 60 | TCE $117,000–$156,000
  • Berlin: Index 47 | TCE $92,000–$123,000
  • Warsaw: Index 22 | TCE $43,000–$58,000
  • Medellín: Index 14 | TCE $27,000–$36,000
  • Bengaluru: Index 13 | TCE $25,000–$34,000
  • Hyderabad: Index 11 | TCE $21,000–$29,000

Statutory Employer Contribution Rates by Market

  • United States: 7.65% (FICA) + state unemployment insurance 1–5% + workers' comp varies: effective ~9–12%
  • United Kingdom: 13.8% employer NI above secondary threshold + 3% pension minimum: effective ~16–17%
  • Germany: health 7.3% + pension 9.3% + unemployment 1.3% + care 1.8%: effective ~19.7% employer contribution
  • France: social charges approximately 42–45% of gross (one of the highest in OECD)
  • Poland: pension 9.76% + disability 6.5% + accident insurance 0.4–3.6% + labor fund 2.45%: effective ~20%
  • Colombia: health 8.5% + pension 12% + ARL (risk) 0.52–6.96% + SENA 2% + ICBF 3% + Caja 4%: effective ~30–37%
  • India: EPF 12% (capped) + ESI 3.25% (below wage ceiling) + gratuity accrual ~4.8% + EDLI 0.5%: effective 8–16% depending on salary band
  • Philippines: SSS 9.5% + PhilHealth 5% + Pag-IBIG 2%: effective ~16.5%
  • Mexico: IMSS contributions ~28% of integrated daily salary for employer: effective ~30%

Salary Appreciation Rate by Market (5-Year Average, Engineering Roles)

  • India (Bengaluru): +10.8%/year average (2021–2026)
  • Poland: +8.4%/year
  • Colombia: +6.2%/year (in USD terms; local currency higher)
  • Mexico: +5.8%/year (in USD terms)
  • Philippines: +5.1%/year
  • Romania: +7.9%/year
  • Germany: +4.2%/year
  • United Kingdom: +5.6%/year
  • United States (SF): +6.8%/year (includes 2021–2022 peak; 2023–2024 saw correction)
  • Implication for multi-year cost models: India salary appreciation is real; a static 5x cost advantage modeled at 2024 rates narrows over time without India salary appreciation in the budget

Quality-Adjusted Cost Efficiency by Market

  • Quality-adjusted cost efficiency = (TCE / quality score) normalized to SF baseline
  • Methodology: quality score based on output data from Remvix client companies running US + offshore teams simultaneously (sprint velocity, defect escape rate, code review quality index)
  • San Francisco: efficiency index 100 (baseline)
  • New York: 95 (slightly more efficient than SF; lower cost, similar quality)
  • Austin: 87 (strong efficiency; material cost saving with minor quality adjustment)
  • Bengaluru (well-managed, >6 months tenure): 78 (after quality and management overhead adjustment)
  • Bengaluru (newly ramped, <6 months): 58 (quality-adjusted; ramp period adjustment)
  • Warsaw: 72
  • Medellín: 68
  • Philippines: 65
  • Key insight: quality-adjusted efficiency for a well-managed Bengaluru team is 78% of SF — meaning the company gets 78 cents of quality-adjusted output for every dollar invested, vs $1.00 in SF, but at 17 cents of the SF cost — a 4.5x efficiency advantage
Get started

Your next great hire is in India. We'll find them.

Talk to a Remvix specialist about your roles, timeline, and budget. Get a tailored shortlist within 7 days — no commitment, no agency lock-in.